Re: RMI question
- From: "Ian deSouza" <ian.a.desouza@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 13:03:42 -0700
Thanks for your suggestion. It seems valid. I do have a facade (wrapper
around my remote) that I'm calling into and I could do this.
Right now (to reduce code), I just retrieve the remote and make the
call directly.
I am a little surprised that this check can't be in the Remote. It
seems to me from my earlier socket programming, that a socket read will
occur when the connected socket goes down. And therefore the Remote
(stub) should be able to tell if its connected socket is still there.
Well, anyway.. thanks for the suggestion (I'm thinking on generating
all those wrapper methods to do that kind of pattern you suggested).
- Ian
.
- References:
- RMI question
- From: Ian deSouza
- Re: RMI question
- From: EJP
- Re: RMI question
- From: Ian deSouza
- Re: RMI question
- From: opalpa@xxxxxxxxx opalinski from opalpaweb
- RMI question
- Prev by Date: Re: File I/O....which class to use?
- Next by Date: Re: RMI question
- Previous by thread: Re: RMI question
- Next by thread: Re: RMI question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|