Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: bcd@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bent C Dalager)
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:59:54 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1164532424.537227.125330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<nebulous99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bent C Dalager wrote:
As for game theory, if that is what you are trying to apply here then
it seems to me you are entirely ignoring the shadow of the future in
your analysis, and you may be stuck in a trivial model where you think
there are only two distinct players in the game.
(Explanation)
Very well, then, it seems that the model has at least two major flaws:
1) It completely disregards the shadow of the future.
2) It presupposes that everyone who observes and participates in the
game is using the same scoring rules that you do. I expect that a
great many people, and in particular people on this newsgroup, do
not. This will tend to result in you coming out of the game with a
completely different score, as viewed by others, than what you
believe. It also exacarbates the negative effects of (1) above.
Cheers
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - bcd@xxxxxxx - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- References:
- Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: Twisted
- Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: Bent C Dalager
- Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- From: nebulous99
- Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- Prev by Date: Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- Next by Date: Re: Quit your day job with Betfair
- Previous by thread: Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- Next by thread: Re: Giving an application a window icon in a sensible way
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|