Re: java or C++ ??
- From: "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:33:07 -0800
"Andrew Thompson" <andrewthommo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1170130023.187183.5910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 2:24 am, "Chris Uppal" wrote:
This would be a reasonable example of a case where multi-posting is to be
preferred over cross-posting -- because the overlap of the C++ and Java
fanatics would almost certainly generate so much heat as to drown out the
more
interesting exchanges between the moderates in both camps.
Slogan: /anything/ is better than a flame-war -- even multi-posting.
I disagree with your conclusions (an occasional
flame-war can be fun to watch, and I think it
helps make clear* any 'seething hatreds' between
group members - hatreds that affect their posts
and replies on other threads, but they are usually
too 'polite' to mention.)
Plus I detest multi-posting.
OTOH - thanks for your alternate perspective,
it did somewhat surprise me that (any) people
might prefer multi-posting to a (potential)
flame-war.
I regretted crossposting from this group to sci.crypt when a flame war
erupted between Tom St Dennis and Roedy Green
--
LTP
:)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Re: java or C++ ??
- References:
- java or C++ ??
- From: patrick
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Randolf Richardson
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Luc The Perverse
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: patrick
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Andrew Thompson
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: java or C++ ??
- From: Andrew Thompson
- java or C++ ??
- Prev by Date: Re: JVM/Java memory footprint
- Next by Date: Re: Servlet image problem
- Previous by thread: Re: java or C++ ??
- Next by thread: Re: java or C++ ??
- Index(es):