Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: Mark Thornton <mark.p.thornton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:07:40 GMT
raddog58c wrote:
On Feb 7, 11:14 am, "Chris Uppal" <chris.up...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
THIS.org> wrote:
disadvantage out of the gate. The late binding to environment could
help close the gap, but that's not guaranteed because the .EXE can be
precompiled for the target deployment environment and if so the race
is over.
The single/multi processor state can be changed after an application has been installed. A JVM will adjust accordingly, but happens to your EXE that was selected/compiled for the single processor that existed at install time? There used to be an issue with maths coprocessors (and may be again if AMDs ideas surface in a product). I think it is still possible for processor upgrades to add SSE3 or similar capability.
Mark Thornton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: raddog58c
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- References:
- Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: amalikarunanayake
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: Jack Kielsmeier
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: raddog58c
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: Mark Thornton
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: raddog58c
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: Chris Uppal
- Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- From: raddog58c
- Help me!! Why java is so popular
- Prev by Date: Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- Next by Date: Re: Why declaring a private abstract method makes no sense??
- Previous by thread: Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- Next by thread: Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|