Re: Help me!! Why java is so popular



raddog58c wrote:
On Feb 7, 11:14 am, "Chris Uppal" <chris.up...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
THIS.org> wrote:
disadvantage out of the gate. The late binding to environment could
help close the gap, but that's not guaranteed because the .EXE can be
precompiled for the target deployment environment and if so the race
is over.


The single/multi processor state can be changed after an application has been installed. A JVM will adjust accordingly, but happens to your EXE that was selected/compiled for the single processor that existed at install time? There used to be an issue with maths coprocessors (and may be again if AMDs ideas surface in a product). I think it is still possible for processor upgrades to add SSE3 or similar capability.

Mark Thornton
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Object Reference Counting
    ... for whether you can use a *.bas Module or require the ROT is whether you're ... in a single-threaded environment or a multi-threaded environment. ... EXE would be single, an ActiveX EXE may be single or multiple, DLLs may be ... >> The problem I now have is to do with object reference counting. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.com)
  • Re: Changing the SMS exe file name based on a compiler variable?
    ... I'm sure there is probably some predefined compiler variable for exe name, ... Compiler variable: _ENVIRONMENT_ ... Am I missing something obvious? ... I'd like this flexibility so I could maintain one ipf across several ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.installer)
  • environment variable question
    ... I have an old DOS 'EXE' program witch works in conjunction with batch files. ... the BAT file executes the variable. ... environment, but I am not SURE this is the case. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • Re: Invoking a process on the remote machine
    ... You need to have some sort of environment to run it in. ... I connect to the remote machine using ObjectManagementScope class, but i am not being able to run the exe through normal Win32 process. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)