Re: problems with Java
- From: "Matt Humphrey" <matth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:04:55 -0400
"Mark Rafn" <dagon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cga0e4-pk9.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ender <astrothayne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not understand why Sun believes that by denying the
programmer powerful tools they are keeping us "safe".
....
and some form of function pointer.
Disagree. Better syntax for anonymous inner classes, sure. Pure function
pointers aren't needed.
I agree function pointers themselves would be bad, but I would really like
to see C# style delegates and events in Java--I think they're clearer than
having to build up an anonymous inner class just to delegate one method.
Matt Humphrey matth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.iviz.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: problems with Java
- From: Lew
- Re: problems with Java
- References:
- problems with Java
- From: ender
- Re: problems with Java
- From: Mark Rafn
- problems with Java
- Prev by Date: Re: Best database for implementing a cache
- Next by Date: Re: Networking works from computer A to computer B, but not vice versa ?!?
- Previous by thread: Re: problems with Java
- Next by thread: Re: problems with Java
- Index(es):