Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Lew <lew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:38:12 -0400
"Twisted" wrote
*Ambiguous* references are the problem, especially when there's a) a
very common meaning and b) a very obscure one and you're fairly
certain the latter is meant. The expectation is that common meaning
...
Not looking good.
I rest my case.
And yet one quick post to the group disambiguated all those to the second major hit on the board.
Yes, the "Go" reference was a tad too hip for the room, perhaps, but it's a well-known game, particularly among engineers, so the introduction of the reference was not such a shot in the dark in context.
--
Lew
.
- References:
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Luc The Perverse
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Lars Enderin
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Lew
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Lars Enderin
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Karl Uppiano
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- From: Karl Uppiano
- Re: Java is slower than C++!
- Prev by Date: JSF, how to display CSV file?
- Next by Date: Re: Java is slower than C++!
- Previous by thread: Re: Java is slower than C++!
- Next by thread: Re: Java is slower than C++!
- Index(es):