Re: Java 7 features
- From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:43:32 GMT
"Twisted" <twisted0n3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185933727.160898.258360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 31, 8:14 pm, Wojtek <nowh...@xxxxx> wrote:
Twisted wrote :
That's the same language whose two-digit-year date type was
responsible for ~70% of Y2K bugs, so you may be expecting a bit too
much of it here. :)
Not really.
Oh, for Christ's sake, is there *always* a nitpicker waiting in the
wings??!
In general, if you say something dead wrong, you can count on being
corrected.
COBOL can handle 4 digit years.
Obviously*. It just didn't do so by default. :P
It didn't do *anything* by default. Programmers had to choose how to
represent dates as character fields; some chose two-digit years.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java 7 features
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java 7 features
- References:
- Re: Java 7 features
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java 7 features
- From: Wojtek
- Re: Java 7 features
- From: Twisted
- Re: Java 7 features
- Prev by Date: Re: increment letters
- Next by Date: Which can I use to export data to pdf or excel?
- Previous by thread: Re: Java 7 features
- Next by thread: Re: Java 7 features
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading