Re: Self-configuring classes



On Aug 9, 12:49 pm, Joe Attardi <jatta...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[misattributes things written by Twisted *again*]

They aren't forged. You know it and I know it. So stop lying.

They are forged. You know it and I know it. So stop lying.

Note also no "0n3" at the end of the username you post under here.

Irrelevant.

[snip more insults, and a futile attempt to convince me that
"resistance is futile"]

Huh? When did I say "resistance is futile" ?

You claimed that if I continue to resist you I'm doomed. Of course, if
I give in to you I'm certainly doomed. So you claimed I was doomed no
matter what, i.e. that resistance was futile.

Win at what?

At stopping you from causing the damage you're trying to cause you
miserable piece of ***. What do you think? You are fighting me.
You've decided to make war, apparently total war until one side or the
other has been utterly destroyed. That means there's a winner and
there's a loser, in case you hadn't figured that out. Moron.

[snip further bogus claims that invasion of privacy is legal]

Not in my jurisfuckingdiction it ain't.

If you're going to destroy me and make my life a shambles

How am I doing this?

What the *** do you think all of this is? It's you trying to destroy
me and me trying to prevent you. And if you keep it up much longer, me
trying to destroy you rather than just produce a tie game.

How can you accuse me of an attack campaign [snip irrelevancies]

Because you're fucking attacking me, you fucking moron! Are you
genuinely that fucking dense?? My God! 99% of your posts to
comp.lang.java.programmer are attacks against Twisted; of your posts
in the last few days all but one (and that one was a token on-topic
post that proves you don't know beans about Java; "why should objects
be immutable" indeed!)...the statistics are amazing. Your primary use
for this newsgroup is as a platform for character assassination of
Twisted; Java discussion comes a distant second, and there's good
reason to suspect the sole reason you post anything on-topic at all is
to sort of alibi yourself against accusations that your sole reason
for posting to the group is to attack me. Which means all I can
*prove* is that your *primary* reason for posting is to attack me,
without proving it's your *sole* reason. :P

In the peacetime before this latest campaign of harassment and
character assassination, I was occasionally posting helpful, on-topic
posts while you were posting ... nothing. You only ever post when
there's a fight going on. Do you really need to ask how I can accuse
you of an attack campaign under these circumstances? The very question
is mind-bogglingly insane in this context!

I've had enough of your threats.

Oh really? And if I make another one, you'll what, exactly?

.


Quantcast