Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- From: Chris Smith <cdsmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:55:17 -0600
Thomas Hawtin <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Smith wrote:
Yes, PrintStream is deprecated; but it's not like you actually avoid it
by wrapping it in something else. You just pretend like you avoid it,
and I'm not a fan of pretending.
Perhaps PrintStream should be deprecated, but it isn't.
Oops. I remembered so clearly that it was, that I didn't even bother to
check before posting. That must have been a particularly vivid dream of
mine!
Thanks,
--
Chris Smith
.
- References:
- Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- From: metaperl.etc@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- From: metaperl
- Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- From: Chris Smith
- Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- From: Thomas Hawtin
- Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- Prev by Date: Re: $50 prize for the first person to break my code
- Next by Date: Re: Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Copyright and Patent Law?
- Previous by thread: Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- Next by thread: Re: Please tighten up these 10 lines of Java code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|