Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Sep 2007 13:04:41 GMT
In article <1189479731.335289.109160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<nebulous99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 6:42 am, blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But you mentioned not only what Joe Attardi [*] had said, but
what I said.
I didn't mention *only* what you said, and I mentioned Attacki
immediately prior to the stuff in question, and you earlier than that.
[*] I can't imagine what you hope to accomplish by misspelling
his name.
Shame him into not posting an output that is 99% attacks and only 1%
off-topic -- what else? Moreover, it may actually be working -- he
hasn't posted anything off-topic or even in questionable taste in a
week now.
Juvenile insults based on misspelling someone's name don't strike
me as an effective way of getting the response you say you want --
unless Joe has concluded that further debate with someone who finds
them an effective technique is pointless.
--
B. L. Massingill
ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Joe Attardi
- Re: Great SWT Program
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Twisted
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Java 7 features
- Next by Date: Re: Java 7 features
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):