Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:11:44 -0000
On Sep 15, 12:05 pm, blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Well, I was curious ....
Running console-mode vim (not gvim) in GNOME's terminal emulator
program on my Linux system, I saw all the characters in the post
by RedGrittyBrick.
There's some sort of cheating going on under the hood there, then,
unless there was manglage you couldn't recognize not being familiar
with all of the languages in question. Most likely the sneaky bit is
buried somewhere in the phrase "GNOME's terminal emulator". I
challenge anyone to make something like this work on the actual,
honest-to-God console, no X services running, no WM loaded, no
nothing. Preferably on an old 386 with only an EGA card so it will be
frankly obvious if the software has "cheated" and is using graphics
mode because everything looks like a Saturday-morning cartoon modulo
blocky pixelization. :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Mike Schilling
- OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- From: RedGrittyBrick
- Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99
- Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: Re: Mobile source location
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Unicode and vi(m). Was Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|