Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- From: xen <xen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:30:56 -0700
I'm pretty sure there is no big difference in memory consumption.
The array itself takes up 16 bytes; that's 8 for the object, 4 for the
size, and 4 for alignment.
So your overhead is 16 bytes.
Add to that what the VM needs for memory allocation, which is also
insignificant compared to 64 MB.
.
- References:
- the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- From: wittle
- Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- From: wittle
- Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- From: Daniel Pitts
- Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- From: wittle
- the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Previous by thread: Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- Next by thread: Re: the inefficiency of noncontiguous data - why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|