How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- From: Ramon F Herrera <ramon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:01 -0700
I am just getting acquainted with some new Java building blocks
through the NetBeans IDE.
The "New Project" item offers several alternatives such as:
- "Module Project"
- "Module Suite Project"
- "Library Wrapper Module Project"
....and so on.
How standardized are such constructs? Are those things above simple
time savers that do some typing for me? IOW, can I take another IDE
and say "I want a 'Library Wrapper Module Project'", and expect to get
pretty much the same files generated?
I am guessing that the concept of 'module' is well defined by some
standard, but what about a 'module suite'?
TIA,
-Ramon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- From: Roedy Green
- Re: How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- From: Mark Space
- Re: How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- From: Owen Jacobson
- Re: How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- Prev by Date: Re: Way to capture System.out in a *sandboxed* app.?
- Next by Date: Re: Interface Method with Interface Parameter
- Previous by thread: Interface Method with Interface Parameter
- Next by thread: Re: How standard and interchangeable are Java modules and the like?
- Index(es):