Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:03:29 -0500
nebulous99@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 7, 10:57 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Which means that when Owen explained to you how screen worked
and you replied:
#That would be a violation of POSIX standards
You lie! He implied a shell behavior that violated the semantics
specified in POSIX, particularly, that a command line of the form
"binaryname arguments" launches a new, previously nonexisting process
running the named binary, when he implied that a command line with a
particular binary name at the start would fail to do so. The only
command lines that should fail to start a new process are shell
builtins. And of course "screen" is not a shell builtin, it's a
binary's name instead.
Now - I know you are not a programmer, so I will have to explain it
explain it very carefully.
When screen is started the second time the screen binary is started.
After it is started it detects the other instance and connects you to
that and exits.
That is completely POSIX compliant. POSIX does not restrict what
code logic can be but in programs.
Arne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bbound
- Re: Great SWT Program
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Internet Explorer jar file update question
- Next by Date: Re: draw transparent componet on bufferedimage?
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|