Re: Great SWT Program

On Dec 23, 10:16 pm, b...@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bent C Dalager) wrote:
Sure it is, but in your case, it's richly deserved.

[irrelevancies deleted]

Piss off.

A one-time cost is irrelevant, of course, since even a small but
recurring benefit will eventually bring the books into the black.

Again, that depends on the accumulated future benefit.

The accumulated future benefit is as large as needed, if you look far
enough ahead.

A
rational actor would therefore save up for that cost and then deploy
the change. Economic theory posits that market forces emerge from the
actions of rational actors. It follows from Economics 101 and your own
claims that emacs should have the highest market share of text
editors. Yet it clearly does not. Economics 101 is unlikely to be
wrong; therefore, you are, Bent.

Economics 101 is wrong

And we're back to Bent's astounding arrogance. If someone disagrees
with him, they're wrong. If fundamental tenets of a field of study
disagree with him, that entire field of study is wrong. I suppose
you're also a flat-earther and a creationist, Bent?

[insult deleted][Bent prattles on]

Go to hell, pervert.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

Your tendency towards intellectual dishonesty is showing, by the way.
In the Great Copyright Debate you argued against preserving copyright
on the nearly identical grounds that the one time cost of creating a
work would always eventually be recouped by its downstream benefits in
one way or another, so works would get created.

[implied insult deleted]

Go to hell, pervert.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

Obscure AND ESPECIALLY non-North-American ones, o Bent Still Repeating
the Third Grade Dalager.

[irrelevancies deleted][insult deleted]

Go to hell, pervert.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

Tell it tohttp://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=0-- I'm
sure they'll love reading about how all of their Web browser market
share figures must have been pulled out of a hat because there's no
such thing as a market share for software that's distributed freely.

[Bent reluctantly concedes my point, but also insults me]

Go to hell, pervert.

None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.

And your evidence to support this bald assertion being?

I have already proven it, of course.

Only in Bent-world does Bent's merely asserting something forcefully
without evidence qualify as "proving" it.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... But, of course, none of the nasty things that you have said or implied ... Go to hell, liar. ... Go to hell, pervert. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... Go to hell, liar. ... None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at ... Go to hell, pervert. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... organize the debate. ... Go to hell, pervert. ... None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... Go to hell, pervert. ... None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at ... The editor you want them all to use requires far more ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)