Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bcd@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bent C Dalager)
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:53:12 +0000 (UTC)
In article <75af1890-83c7-4683-9dfe-598b62da450a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<bbound@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Go to hell, pervert.
Go to hell, liar.
Go to hell, liar.
Go to hell, liar.
If you realized it, why did you reply to it and try to use it to
leverage a change of subject?
Because it wasn't a throwaway at the time
Yes, it was. Do not presume to tell me how I meant something, you
arrogant prick.
It is quite clear that what you now mean that you meant by it then has
no connection to what you actually /did/ mean by it then. You have
probably been quite successful at repressing this particular bit of
cognitive dissonance, of course.
But then, if I didn't ... there would hardly be much thread here at all.
Which would be a good thing.
Hardly.
Yes, it would.
You seem to be the only one to think so but - I suppose - in
Twisted-world, that is all it takes for something to be a universal
truth.
Cheers,
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - bcd@xxxxxxx - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
.
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Bent C Dalager
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bbound
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: Re: undefined reference to when using gcj
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):