Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bcd@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bent C Dalager)
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:19:51 +0000 (UTC)
In article <5401c581-8dce-44ab-be30-465ded4460c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<twerpinator@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Piss off.
How fortunate, but it does not change the fact that such attempts have
been made, and at least one attacker, Tristram, continues to make such
attempts.
Seeing as they have made no progress after several months, I think you
can breathe easy on this one. If they were going to have a
breakthrough it would have happened by now.
I cannot ignore the fact that the attempt was made in the first place,
though.
No, sure, remember it all you want, but their attempt /and failure/
speaks more solidly of your pseudonym's high level of protection than
had they not attempted at all. The only logical conclusion is that it
is quite iron-clad and that remains my working hypothesis.
Cheers,
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - bcd@xxxxxxx - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
.
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Bent C Dalager
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|