Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:33:03 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 30 2007, 8:21 pm, b...@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bent C Dalager) wrote:
Oh, really? Why do you still believe that it is impossible for a tool
to be powerful, yet do one job and do it well (i.e. no feeping) and
have an easy to use interface? Surely you've seen Eclipse by now?
Eclipse does much more than just one job, of course.
It's a Java IDE. The framework underlying it can be, and is, used for
other things, but the application itself is a Java IDE.
[insults Eclipse by calling it "the new emacs"]
You evil, vile foul-mouthed *cad*! How dare you compare Eclipse to
that execrable, wonky, awful-UI piece of legacy crud?
This would seem to explain a great deal. Although I'm not sure what
variety of aberrant psychology will, in turn, explain *it*.
[insult deleted]
I know it well enough to know that you're lying, and none of the nasty
things that you have said or implied about me are at all true.
An irrelevant one. We were, of course, discussing what I find
intolerable in a UI, not plugin architectures.
So when we were /actually/ discussing the emacs plugin architecture
No. Read what I wrote again. We were discussing what I find
intolerable in a UI. You went off on a tangent about plugin
architectures.
[insult deleted; further rewriting of history deleted]
Futile. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about
me are at all true.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Bent C Dalager
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: XML parser and writer
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
