Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Jan 2008 09:49:54 GMT
In article <a841fccc-dbe9-445f-9c7c-d4e9dde41d89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<bbound@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 10, 4:16 am, blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <blm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"io"?
Error: Sentence fragment of unclear meaning.
Clearer -- or so I claim -- if considered as a response to
something you said in the post to which I was replying.
Not only doesn't the name of one of Jupiter's moons make any sense as
a sentence all its own, but what you just wrote also doesn't make much
sense, though at least this time it actually appears to be a complete
sentence.
As I explained in text you didn't bother to quote, "io" was not
meant to refer to Jupiter's moon by that name, but to .... No,
I'm not going to say it again. I begin to believe at last that
your objective here is not to engage in any kind of reasoned
discussion, but simply to make your "opponents" look bad.
Perhaps *I* should declare victory (over the temptation to keep
playing, if nothing else) and leave the field?
[ snip ]
--
B. L. Massingill
ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Great SWT Program
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bbound
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by Date: Re: Great SWT Program
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
