Re: Great SWT Program
- From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Jan 2008 09:06:43 GMT
bbound@xxxxxxxxx <bbound@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A mathematically irrefutable fact that's not particularly relevant
to whether it's faster to type 2N characters than N characters
On the contrary; assuming a typing speed of x characters per second,
it will take 2Nx seconds versus Nx seconds.
rotfl.
well occur, but over a large enough amount of typing it will still
average out to 2N characters taking twice as long to type.
Except it doesn't, because the slow sequences (those including
keys outside the main part) are considerably rarer used in the
long term with either emacs or vim.
If you take out all long-haired persons from a group, then
the average hair-length of that group will of course drop
considerably.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: nebulous99
- Re: Great SWT Program
- References:
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bbound
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: twerpinator
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: blmblm
- Re: Great SWT Program
- From: bbound
- Re: Great SWT Program
- Prev by Date: Re: CopyOnWriteHashMap (application to OSGi services)
- Next by Date: Re: Eclipse and other Java IDE
- Previous by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Next by thread: Re: Great SWT Program
- Index(es):