Re: Closing ServletInputStream
- From: Lew <lew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:55:26 -0500
"adblock" <A.Grasoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote...
no, the server should deal with it
ok.. but.. why? :)
On 31 ���, 04:17, "Crouchez" <safdfagf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:"adblock" <A.Gras...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cc84a78b-4755-4cfa-964e-63778a6f63da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,no, the server should deal with it
Is it necessary to close the InputStream, which was getted by call of
method ServletRequest.getInputStream() ?
adblock, your quoting style is hard to follow. Just trim the post to which you are replying and insert your comments - no need to requote the quoted part again.
Crouchez wrote:
because the server deals with the sockets and keep-alive connections etc.
and so that the programmer doesn't have to. To flip your question about, adblock, why would you NOT let the server close it for you?
--
Lew
.
- References:
- Closing ServletInputStream
- From: adblock
- Re: Closing ServletInputStream
- From: Crouchez
- Re: Closing ServletInputStream
- From: adblock
- Re: Closing ServletInputStream
- From: Crouchez
- Closing ServletInputStream
- Prev by Date: Re: Free Certifications from www.brainbeer.scum
- Next by Date: Re: How to execute Jar file using Batch file.
- Previous by thread: Re: Closing ServletInputStream
- Next by thread: java version detection and browser notification
- Index(es):