Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- From: Logician <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 9, 12:48 pm, Andrew Thompson <andrewtho...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 9, 10:16 pm, Logician <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to write an interactive image which presents search
results in a tree structure. I see at many sites Java is used for
interactivion with images.
Do you mean as in 'Java applets embedded
in a web page?'.
I mean either an applet or a servlet, but via the WWW.
I would like any views from Java developers why Java is used over C#
as that will help me decide what language to use.
Is there such as a thing as a c# 'applet' that
can be embedded in a web page?
No, you can run .aspx pages which are completely dynamic. The whole
thing runs server side.
Is your client base 'Windows' or 'PCs in general'?
The work is all WWW based. If you see http://www.muckety.com/ you can
see the idea of the interactive map I am trying to follow. I like the
idea of a natural linking process via an image.
I think this is easy to implement in C# but everyone seems to use Java
for this type work. So I was wondering if Java offered some benefits
over C# for interaction with images.
--
Andrew T.
PhySci.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- References:
- C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- From: Logician
- Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- From: Andrew Thompson
- C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- Prev by Date: Re: PDF compression library
- Next by Date: Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- Previous by thread: Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- Next by thread: Re: C# versus Java for Interactive Images
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|