Re: I'm annoyed
- From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:19:20 -0700
Lew wrote:
Lew wrote:
You performed a normal method call, 'loadClass()'. My analysis was
that the error occurred on the attempt to load the class,
completely
consistent with the documentation that it occurs when the JVM or
"ClassLoader instance tries to load in the definition". This
happened at run time. The action was entirely consistent with the
documentation.
"Mike Schilling" wrote:
Excpet that it didn't happen "as part of a normal method call or as
part of creating a new instance using the new expression"
Except that it did happen as part of a normal method call.
What in Java does not? I read "as part of a normal method call" as
"the class in loaded as a side effect of calling a method". This
wasn't a side effect, it was the purpose of the call.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Lew
- Re: I'm annoyed
- References:
- I'm annoyed
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Lew
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Lew
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Lew
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: I'm annoyed
- From: Lew
- I'm annoyed
- Prev by Date: Re: Terminolgy: the verb corresponding to "toString"
- Next by Date: Question on Java .form and Eclipse
- Previous by thread: Re: I'm annoyed
- Next by thread: Re: I'm annoyed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|