Re: Meta: avoiding post corruption was Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Andrew Thompson <andrewthommo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 12, 6:38 am, n...@xxxxxxxxxxx (Nad) wrote:
...and Andrew for example,
..can confirm that all your ranting and moaning and
'threats' adds and up to so much 'thin air'. As a
spammer you are merely ridiculous, NewsMaestro, but
as a threat you are entirely ludicrous.
--
Andrew T.
.
- References:
- Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Piotr Kobzda
- Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Piotr Kobzda
- Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Lew
- Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Piotr Kobzda
- Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Lew
- Meta: avoiding post corruption was Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: zerg
- Re: Meta: avoiding post corruption was Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- From: Nad
- Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- Prev by Date: Re: Struts - Getter method
- Next by Date: Re: Multiple template classes with different parameter lists
- Previous by thread: Re: Meta: avoiding post corruption was Re: Another DCL-like approach, correct or broken?
- Next by thread: writing a file in java
- Index(es):
