Re: Innovation, my TSP algorithm and factoring, timelines

Jesse F. Hughes schrieb:
JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Aug 24, 5:59 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

[...]

If you people succeed the United States will no longer be the dominant
country in the world.
I am still hopeful that we can at least avoid a nuclear event.
But I'm running out of ideas for how to stop you.
Well, no wonder. Your heart's probably not in it.

Used to be that the threat we faced was the end of humanity itself.
Now, it's just a power struggle between nations. How dull and
parochial.

Frankly, it must be a letdown. Back in the day, you faced a way
bigger and more ominous threat. With space aliens, too.
I've been solving problems.

Thankfully, the rest of the world is not quite as out of it as people
in the United States and Britain.

What did the rest of the world do to fix things?

So the threats have diminished in size.

But now I'm fighting the smaller task of saving my own country, and it
is getting to be a more desperate one, with time running out.

Have you considered a collaboration with Mehran Basti (in sci.math)?
Together, I bet you two could solve most everything in world affairs.


I think Xah Lee would be the best fitting partner for him.
Though I doubt Xah Lee would be into it. Xah Lee's can start a flame by just posting a single well written bollocks. JSH has to feed his bull*** steadily so the thread grows.



OMG you were talking here about the morale of some P=NP algorithm all that are still in their right mind doubt to work.

JSH still lacks of any Mathematical proof for his algo to work ..
he lacks even describing his algorithm in a way that makes it for others understandable. He is not even able to hack together a program demonstrating his algorithm ... which should be less than 2 hours of work.


I hate it to say but I am no longer open minded about the stuff JSH proposes and no longer willing to read any more bullocks here.
The only reason I keep watching this thread currently is giving out Links to diffrent people on my University to have a good laugh.

I am sorry for the harsh words but who ever is unable to write down an algorithm in a way others can understand it.
Or write a program to describe the algorithm.
Or write a proove for it working (which would need a definition).

Shows with this a mathematical ineptness that gives about the same improbability that the algorithm works as the claim it solves P=NP question. (Both together ...)

Please couldn't this thread go on in some politics / alt.religion group.
It has nothing to do with java. And the comp.science part (another group that exists, though would have less patience with JSH) is less and less credible. (From if the algo works to what would happen if the algo would be released to the public, wow.)

Christian
.

Quantcast