Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Tom Anderson <twic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:11:21 +0100
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Lew wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote:So do you have a Mac now?
Lew wrote:Huh?
Tom Anderson wrote:The problem was reported on a Mac. From your data, it looks like it's not a problem on whatever non-lickable platform you use, but that doesn't mean it's not a problem on a Mac.
The OP's post was about a Mac. Your post was about Sun, and it was that to which I responded most directly. I also explained upthread how comparing to other platforms is useful to isolate whether the problem is Mac-specific.
Regardless, my post of statistical summaries was directly about your suggestion that we post a bug report to Sun because it wasn't difficult to do so.
My suggestion of reporting a bug to Sun was mistaken - i was thoroughly corrected on that point. I certainly agree with you about not reporting this to Sun.
Performance *is* a goal for Sun, and so they are likely to find performance problems interesting.
...
Filing a bug report about it is easy to do, so why not?
My post was also intended as a model for how to investigate prior to reporting a bug to Apple, and a contravention of the extension of the "easy so why not?" philosophy to organizations other than Sun.
Sun, Apple or whomever, it doesn't make sense to report a bug unless you have some pretty good evidence that there is one to report. Running a micro-benchmark through five loops on one machine with an unknown load, even if it is a might Mac, might not really be enough evidence to report a bug no matter how easy it might be for the *reporter* of the bug.
Can you see how my example might generalize, or are we going to quibble more about its relevance?
I certainly endorse making more thorough measurements before reporting - you make a good point there.
tom
--
wicked wicked jungle is massive i said wicked wicked jungle is massive
well big up cos this is the incredible genral -- fabien, sniffunsnuffun
town(scotland)
.
- References:
- Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Kevin McMurtrie
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Kevin McMurtrie
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Tom Anderson
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Tom Anderson
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Lew
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Tom Anderson
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Lew
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Tom Anderson
- Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- From: Lew
- Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- Prev by Date: Re: Novice linux java coder needs help getting progs to run
- Next by Date: Re: what's the best application server
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Java 1.6 number crunching slower than 1.5?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|