Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: Lew <noone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:01:28 -0800
Lew wrote:
If your observation that such expressionscause defects
has any evidence to back it up it's
a good argument for something. Maybe not for changing the potency of the
auto-inc/decrement operator but for hiring better-trained programmers, but for
something. Assuming the evidence sustains the observation.
If you have a hard time understanding that expression and you call yourself a
Java programmer, there's a disconnect.
--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
.
- References:
- Curious compiler warning
- From: Novice
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: Lew
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: Lew
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: Arved Sandstrom
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Curious compiler warning
- From: Lew
- Curious compiler warning
- Prev by Date: Re: Curious compiler warning
- Next by Date: Re: Curious compiler warning
- Previous by thread: Re: Curious compiler warning
- Next by thread: Re: Curious compiler warning
- Index(es):