Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge
From: David (david.orriss.jr_at_gmail.ihatespamsodoyou.com)
Date: 08/18/04
- Next message: wrobel.cwirek: "cost of MyEclipse"
- Previous message: wald: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- In reply to: wald: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Next in thread: John C. Bollinger: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:37:57 -0700
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:53:09 +0000 (UTC), wald
<arnout.standaert@n*o_s-p%a|m.cit.kuleuven.ac.be> wrote:
>I'm just curious... does JBuilder use less memory than Eclipse? I
>mean RAM, not hard drive space or anything.
Depends on the distribution. JBuilder Foundation and Eclipse 3 have
about the same memory requirements. They also have roughly the same
feature set.
- Next message: wrobel.cwirek: "cost of MyEclipse"
- Previous message: wald: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- In reply to: wald: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Next in thread: John C. Bollinger: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
