Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge
From: Dave Stallard (stallard_at_nospam.ever)
Date: 08/23/04
- Previous message: Ed Ort: "Online chat, August 24, on J2ME Wireless Toolkit 2.2"
- In reply to: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Next in thread: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Reply: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:06:46 -0400
Joe Fischer wrote:
> Sounds like your mind is made up, which is fine. I have some
> projects with hundreds of classes, some of them rather large. I don't
> see much change in the memory image with those loaded up.
Maybe not. If it actually stops at 100 MB, then that might not be so
bad. I'm used to JBuilder's image size growing with use, which might be
a specific problem with JBuilder that Eclipse wouldn't have. I only
have 256MB on my Win2K machine, and I suppose I should join the modern
world.
> Any developer machine is going to need a lot of memory. Hard
> to get around that.
I'm not sure I buy that. That seems to me to be just a rationale for
over-sized IDEs like Visual (Fee-fi-fo-fum!) Studio.
Eclipse is built on SWT, which is supposed to be more efficient and
close to native widgets than Sun's GUI layer. I guess I had hoped for a
smaller, more efficient IDE than what I saw in Eclipse 3.0.
My favorite IDE of all time is still Intellij's IDEA, but that program
really was a memory hog.
Dave
- Previous message: Ed Ort: "Online chat, August 24, on J2ME Wireless Toolkit 2.2"
- In reply to: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Next in thread: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Reply: Joe Fischer: "Re: Eclipse 3.0 is huge"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|