taming IntelliJ on JavaDoc
- From: Roedy Green <my_email_is_posted_on_my_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:51:12 GMT
IntelliJ trashes my JavaDoc by reflowing comments that contains HTML
tags.
e.g.
Are the following quirks of the calendar considered in this code?<br>
<dl
* compact> <dt>yes</dt> <dd>1900 is not a leap year (mod 100).</dd>
* <dt>yes</dt> <dd>2000 is a leap year (mod 400).</dd> <dt>yes</dt>
<dd>The 10
* missing days in 1582 October. (Pope Gregory's correction) 1582 Oct
5 to 1582
* Oct 14 never happened.</dd> <dt>partly</dt> <dd>Britain and its
territories
* (including the USA and Canada) adopted the Gregorian correction in
1752. By
* then, 11 days had to be dropped. 1752 September 3 to 1752 September
13 never
* happened. However, you can modify constants in BigDate to use the
British
*
That used to read:
Are the following quirks of the calendar considered in this code?<br>
<dl compact>
<dt>yes</dt>
<dd>1900 is not a leap year (mod 100).</dd>
<dt>yes</dt>
<dd>2000 is a leap year (mod 400).</dd>
<dt>yes</dt>
<dd>The 10 missing days in 1582 October. (Pope Gregory's correction)
1582 Oct 5 to 1582 Oct 14 never happened.</dd>
<dt>partly</dt>
<dd>Britain and its territories (including the USA and Canada)
adopted the Gregorian correction in 1752. By then, 11 days had to be
dropped. 1752 September 3 to 1752 September 13 never * happened.
However, you can modify constants in BigDate to use the British...
It is even more scrambled if there are blank lines.
Is there a way to get it to stop doing that or to reformat the HTML
much like an HTML editor would?
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: taming IntelliJ on JavaDoc
- From: Daniel Dyer
- Re: taming IntelliJ on JavaDoc
- Prev by Date: Source Code Spell Checker
- Next by Date: Problem with java.io.File and Multi - Threads
- Previous by thread: Source Code Spell Checker
- Next by thread: Re: taming IntelliJ on JavaDoc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|