Re: Comparing Eclipse and NetBeans



If you read the title of the article - "Tools Talk: A Conversation With
Java Technology Evangelist Charles Ditzel" - you have the answer for
most of your questions :-) If you have the corresponding article from
Charles opposite number in the Eclipse Foundation, Wayne Beaton, he
would have found an equal number of points in favor of Eclipse, RCP and
the tools.

Both of these people are evangelists - and fortunately public about
this fact - and as such they are supposed to find points in favor of
their "own" product.

The truth is that both products are fine for their intended areas:
Netbeans seems to be stronger when it comes to GUI development, whereas
Eclipse seems stronger when it comes to plugin support in the basic
product, model support (EMF and GEF), an independent platform (RCP) and
support for obscure languages :-) Of cause, YMMW...

/tonny

ps. I'm likely to be biased as I have started The RCP Company,
rcp-company.com, based on the Eclipse platform. We don't really compare
or judge NetBeans versus Eclipse; We prefer to compare Microsoft .Net
and Eclipse RCP.

On Oct 13, 1:05 am, "Veloso" <starlo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Java.sun.com, Sun's main Java site, has a new article
up(http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Interviews/ditzel_qa....)
that compares NetBeans with Eclipse. In it, Sun's Charles Ditzel
claims:

-- NetBeans is a far simpler download with far greater functionality.
For instance, he says, "to build a graphical user interface (GUI),
NetBeans provides the NetBeans IDE GUI Builder, the best free Java
technology-based GUI builder. Eclipse 3.1 requires you to download
Visual Editor Project, which is another 7 or 8 megabytes, and has
nowhere near the features of the NetBeans IDE GUI Builder.
If you want to build a Struts, JavaServer Pages (JSP), or JavaServer
Faces technology-based web application with the NetBeans IDE, it's
already included, whereas with Eclipse, you have to download a 180+
megabyte Web Tools Platform (WTP) project that lacks Struts support and
requires yet another module for JavaServer Faces technology support."

-- He admits that Eclipse is addressing compatibility issues with
Callisto, but says the "jury is still out".

My experience is mostly with NetBeans. Question: Is Ditzel giving a
straight story or just being a shill for Sun, where he works? Would
anyone who has knowledge of both Eclipse and NetBeans care to take what
he says on? Or, for that matter, confirm it?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Comparing Eclipse and NetBeans
    ... Charles opposite number in the Eclipse Foundation, Wayne Beaton, he ... Netbeans seems to be stronger when it comes to GUI development, ... Eclipse seems stronger when it comes to plugin support in the basic ... requires yet another module for JavaServer Faces technology support." ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: Eclipse vs netbeans
    ... NetBeans comes with support for EJB's and other web based technologies ... I believe that Eclipse has plug-ins for ... I personally find it a pain to install the correct plugins for Eclipse supporting JSP, ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: IDE for JSF
    ... Any JSF plugins for Eclipse or NetBeans? ... For Eclipse try MyEclipse, Netbeans I think has some support for it already ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: A constructive debate: Eclipse or NetBeans?
    ... However, I've tried NetBeans recently. ... better support for creating GUIs than Eclipse ... "make" as a build system and primarily programming in OCaml. ... Sun's Java implementation. ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: netbeans - or - Eclipse
    ... > Inviting comments about the free IDEs Eclipse and Netbeans ... > If you are using one of the two - have you tried the other IDE? ... Eclipse, and I'm unlikely to change again. ... The debugger is pathetic; I ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)