Re: Comparing Eclipse and NetBeans



Thanks for all these comments; they are helpful. It's clear that these
matters are somewhat subjective and your perspective is likely to vary
according to your needs and expectations. These comments confirm that
both Eclipse and NetBeans have varying strengths and weaknesses and
that it's hard to generalize much... When time allows, I'll check out
Eclipse in more details...


On Oct 15, 8:58 am, "Tonny Madsen" <tonny.mad...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry about the double post...

Have a look at

http://www.google.com/trends?q=netbeans%2C+eclipse&ctab=0&geo=all&dat...

to see the thrends from a search engine point-of-view...

/tonny

On Oct 13, 1:05 am, "Veloso" <starlo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Java.sun.com, Sun's main Java site, has a new article
up(http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Interviews/ditzel_qa....)
that compares NetBeans with Eclipse. In it, Sun's Charles Ditzel
claims:

-- NetBeans is a far simpler download with far greater functionality.
For instance, he says, "to build a graphical user interface (GUI),
NetBeans provides the NetBeans IDE GUI Builder, the best free Java
technology-based GUI builder. Eclipse 3.1 requires you to download
Visual Editor Project, which is another 7 or 8 megabytes, and has
nowhere near the features of the NetBeans IDE GUI Builder.
If you want to build a Struts, JavaServer Pages (JSP), or JavaServer
Faces technology-based web application with the NetBeans IDE, it's
already included, whereas with Eclipse, you have to download a 180+
megabyte Web Tools Platform (WTP) project that lacks Struts support and
requires yet another module for JavaServer Faces technology support."

-- He admits that Eclipse is addressing compatibility issues with
Callisto, but says the "jury is still out".

My experience is mostly with NetBeans. Question: Is Ditzel giving a
straight story or just being a shill for Sun, where he works? Would
anyone who has knowledge of both Eclipse and NetBeans care to take what
he says on? Or, for that matter, confirm it?- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A constructive debate: Eclipse or NetBeans?
    ... However, I've tried NetBeans recently. ... better support for creating GUIs than Eclipse ... "make" as a build system and primarily programming in OCaml. ... Sun's Java implementation. ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: Comparing Eclipse and NetBeans
    ... Charles opposite number in the Eclipse Foundation, Wayne Beaton, he ... Netbeans seems to be stronger when it comes to GUI development, ... Eclipse seems stronger when it comes to plugin support in the basic ... requires yet another module for JavaServer Faces technology support." ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: Comparing Eclipse and NetBeans
    ... Charles opposite number in the Eclipse Foundation, Wayne Beaton, he ... Netbeans seems to be stronger when it comes to GUI development, ... Eclipse seems stronger when it comes to plugin support in the basic ... requires yet another module for JavaServer Faces technology support." ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: netbeans - or - Eclipse
    ... > Inviting comments about the free IDEs Eclipse and Netbeans ... > If you are using one of the two - have you tried the other IDE? ... Eclipse, and I'm unlikely to change again. ... The debugger is pathetic; I ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)
  • Re: A constructive debate: Eclipse or NetBeans?
    ... I've been using Eclipse for a while. ... However, I've tried NetBeans recently. ... more clean than Eclipse in managing plugins and installs ... I vaguely remember that NetBeans GUI builder used some non-standard Java classes - I didn't like this, and I use Eclipse for my Console Java and Swing Java projects. ...
    (comp.lang.java.softwaretools)