Re: Help finding Madeleine McCann - 4 years old

Daniel Dyer wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:00:39 +0100, JT <jtlinux1@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Find Maddie spammed all of usenet at once and said

Help them to find Maddie !!!
She's 4 years old and has a distinctive mark on right eye.
£ 2.6 millions reward for anyone with valid informations.
(link to spam/scam site snipped)

You are a multi-posting spammer. That's valid (Even though you're not). Where's my money?

How does one get a distinctive "...mark on right eye"?


This is not a scam, it's been all over the news for the last month. They are trying to raise awareness in parts of the world where it hasn't been as widely reported as it has in the UK and Portugal:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6714297.stm

Dan.

I never said it was a scam Dan. The / means or. I subscribe to about 30 news groups and I'd say this exact message is in a good 90% of them, so that makes it spam, does it not.

As an aside, I feel bad for the family, don't get me wrong. But hundreds of kids go missing every day around the world. Can you imagine what would happen if ever one of those missing kids resulted in a multi-post to usenet?

Where do we, as usenet users, draw the line? Can we accept this multi-post but reject others bases solely on the message it is trying to convey?
.

Relevant Pages