Re: Programming languages for the very young
From: John Doty (jpd_at_w-d.org)
Date: 01/28/04
- Next message: Michael D. Ober: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Previous message: Darin Johnson: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- In reply to: John Doty: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Next in thread: m-coughlin: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:45:10 +0500
In article <86SRb.308725$JQ1.118613@pd7tw1no>, "Yoyoma_2"
<Yoyoma_2@[at-]hotmail.com> wrote:
> John Doty wrote:
No, I didn't write that, you did!
>
> I agree LOGO is a great language for the very, very young. But as soon
> as they get in 7th or 8th grade they will get very bored of it quick.
Do you actually know Logo? It's a powerful, sophisticated language. If you
give 8th graders 4th grade exercises they'll get bored, sure. But give
them appropriate material, and Logo is great.
> I
> wonder why everyone discounts teaching VB.
Maybe because it's a crude, crummy language that encourages sloppy
programming?
-- | John Doty "You can't confuse me, that's my job." | Home: jpd@w-d.org | Work: jpd@space.mit.edu
- Next message: Michael D. Ober: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Previous message: Darin Johnson: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- In reply to: John Doty: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Next in thread: m-coughlin: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|