Re: Programming languages for the very young
From: Michael D. Ober (obermd-._at_.-alum-mit-edu-nospam)
Date: 01/30/04
- Next message: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: Problem get the value of a field in the Reflection API"
- In reply to: Joe Marshall: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Next in thread: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Reply: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Reply: Ray Dillinger: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:10:55 -0700
"Joe Marshall" <jrm@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:3c9yep0t.fsf@ccs.neu.edu...
> "Michael D. Ober" <obermd-.@.-alum-mit-edu-nospam> writes:
>
> > The last time I looked, all processors except the IBM mainframe
processors
> > have machine level SUB and RET instructions. These are the two
instructions
> > required for subroutines.
>
> You only need a conditional branch to get subroutines. It's a pain,
> but you can do it.
Actually, BAL does it with unconditional branches. My point was that
subroutines are part of the stack machine model that just about every
processor uses and that processors support them in machine code.
Mike.
- Next message: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: Problem get the value of a field in the Reflection API"
- In reply to: Joe Marshall: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Next in thread: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Reply: Alex McDonald: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Reply: Ray Dillinger: "Re: Programming languages for the very young"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]