Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language
From: Victor Bazarov (v.Abazarov_at_comAcast.net)
Date: 02/06/04
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Previous message: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- In reply to: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:40:07 GMT
"Larry Hazel" <lhhazel@otelco.net> wrote...
> Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > When I need a language that's easy to use and readable, I turn
> > directly to C. Don't let me stop you, though.
> >
>
> C? Easy to read? You have got to be kidding.
C to a C[++] programmer is no more difficult than Chinese to
an educated Chinese person. I, on the other hand have no
idea how to read Chinese. But I don't exclaim "you've got
to be kidding" when somebody says that Chinese is possible
to read.
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Previous message: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- In reply to: Larry Hazel: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Reply: Georg Bauhaus: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|