Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language
From: Martin Krischik (krischik_at_users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 02/07/04
- Next message: MSG: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Robert I. Eachus: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:43:31 +0100
Martijn Lievaart wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:02:31 -0500, Jeff Schwab wrote:
> I find that different languages fit different needs. The choice of
> language is often dictated by how much experience one/the team has with
> languages. I would never choose ada, simply because I don't know it at
> all.
Try to learn it. After 10 years of C and C++ I wanted someting new. I
learned Ada and hey wow I wish I had done earlier.
> To clarify that last remark, there may be languages that do generics
> better (I don't know them, but they are bound to exist),
Well then let me enlighten you: Ada generics are better. I could explain it
to you but it would be a rather large Article and I am unshure if anybody
is truly interested.
> but those are not
> mainstream.
Well Boing, Airbus, NASA - your are right, not Mainstream.
With Regards
Martin
-- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com
- Next message: MSG: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Robert I. Eachus: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|