Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: Martin Ambuhl (mambuhl_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/08/04
- Next message: jova: "array to linklist"
- Previous message: Josh Sebastian: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Josh Sebastian: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Thomas Stegen CES2000: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:39:36 GMT
Josh Sebastian and Martin Krischik are continuing their silly language
advocacy.
Perhaps comp.lang.ada cares about the preference of one for Ada;
perhaps comp.lang.c++. Who knows what the people in comp.lang.java care
about? I know for damn sure that comp.lang.c is not the place for your
silly discussion of Ada vs. C++.
I have set follow-ups to comp.lang.ada and comp.lang.c++. Even that might
be too much. In any event, take comp.lang.c off any future exchanges you
idiots have. Even better: take it to e-mail.
-- Martin Ambuhl
- Next message: jova: "array to linklist"
- Previous message: Josh Sebastian: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Josh Sebastian: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Thomas Stegen CES2000: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|