Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: MSG (msg1825_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/10/04
- Next message: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Berlin Brown: "Re: Include a Servlet into web page body"
- In reply to: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: David Rasmussen: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Marin David Condic: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 9 Feb 2004 18:26:33 -0800
Thanks very much to everyone for the interesting info. It made me look
more closely at Ada. It looks like it is indeed one of the safest
languages among the ones that aren't garbage collected, which probably
makes it suitable for programming things like airplanes, etc.:
1. hard real-time
2. bug-averse
3. not very performance demanding (don't know about other compilers,
but they say GNAT produces slow executables)
However, it does not look like it's a good match for me, since my
needs are the exact opposite:
1. no real time
2. bugs welcome (but not wrong results) - lusers will not come near my
programs
3. performance is highly important
James Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@att.net> wrote in message news:<Xns9489AEC0F8702jimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1>...
> Given the quite reasonable objections presented by some in the
> cross-posted news-groups I would like to carry on this conversation
> with you via email. My return email is valid.
>
> Jim Rogers
- Next message: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Berlin Brown: "Re: Include a Servlet into web page body"
- In reply to: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Ed Falis: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: David Rasmussen: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Marin David Condic: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|