Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: David Rasmussen (david.rasmussen_at_gmx.net)
Date: 02/10/04
- Next message: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: MSG: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:10:28 +0100
MSG wrote:
> 3. not very performance demanding (don't know about other compilers,
> but they say GNAT produces slow executables)
>
Who says that? Ada can be at least as fast as C++.
/David, writing from comp.lang.c++
- Next message: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: MSG: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
