Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov (mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de)
Date: 02/10/04
- Previous message: Marin David Condic: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:13:24 +0100
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:08:16 +0000 (UTC), "Martin Dowie"
<martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
>news:vjah20tahj48fftkpeghp29ugnojfdd4r4@4ax.com...
>> >3. performance is highly important
>>
>> GNAT is a front end of GNU C...
>
>Not quite...
>...they share a back-end - GNAT does NOT translate Ada source into C as an
>intermediate.
Yes of course, GNU C is just a name of a set of compilers. Important
is that the back-end is same, so it is unlikely for GNAT to be slower
than GNU C. Theoretically Ada as a language should allow better
optimization than C.
-- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de
- Previous message: Marin David Condic: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Martin Dowie: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|