Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: MSG (msg1825_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: gtz669: "Re: Null exception assigning string"
- Previous message: August Derleth: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Robert I. Eachus: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Feb 2004 18:19:13 -0800
Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message news:<vjah20tahj48fftkpeghp29ugnojfdd4r4@4ax.com>...
> On 9 Feb 2004 18:26:33 -0800, msg1825@yahoo.com (MSG) wrote:
> >
> >1. no real time
[...]
> >2. bugs welcome (but not wrong results) - lusers will not come near my
> >programs
[...]
> It is easy to write a virus program scanning your source codes and
> randomly sowing them with bugs, if you so enjoy them...
What I meant was of course that I don't place as much emphasis on
these as, say, Boeing does, and so all other factors in language
choice become relatively more important to me.
> >3. performance is highly important
>
> GNAT is a front end of GNU C...
Can you write (*) a matrix multiplication routine in Ada, compile it
with GNAT and measure the number CPU cycles per FLOP, compare to a
similar routine in C?
The shootout seems to put GNAT closer to Perl and Java than to C/C++.
Cheers,
MSG
(*) Only if you think the one on the shootout page is inadequate.
- Next message: gtz669: "Re: Null exception assigning string"
- Previous message: August Derleth: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: James Rogers: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Dmitry A. Kazakov: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Robert I. Eachus: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|