Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)

From: James Rogers (jimmaureenrogers_at_att.net)
Date: 02/11/04

  • Next message: Tom N: "Re: Execute Java in a new window" 
    Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:30:17 GMT

    msg1825@yahoo.com (MSG) wrote in
    news:54759e7e.0402101819.95cec1d@posting.google.com:

    > Can you write (*) a matrix multiplication routine in Ada, compile it
    > with GNAT and measure the number CPU cycles per FLOP, compare to a
    > similar routine in C?
    > The shootout seems to put GNAT closer to Perl and Java than to C/C++.

    The shootout numbers I saw put vc at .07, gcc at 0.10 and GNAT at .20.
    Java was 0.73 and Perl was 34.31.

    I do not see how .2 is closer to .7 or 34 than it is to .1.

    Your mathematics seems seriously flawed.

    Please explain your reasoning.

    Jim Rogers

  • Next message: Tom N: "Re: Execute Java in a new window"

    Relevant Pages