Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)
From: Preben Randhol (randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news_at_pvv.org)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC)
On 2004-02-11, Xenos <dont.spam.me@spamhate.com> wrote:
> But of course, the first example will only work if S'Length is equal to
> T'Length or it will raise a constraint_error. The second will only work if
> T'Length is greater than or equal to S'Length.
Yes, you won't get a buffer overflow.
Preben
-- "When Roman engineers built a bridge, they had to stand under it while the first legion marched across. If programmers today worked under similar ground rules, they might well find themselves getting much more interested in Ada!" -- Robert Dewar
- Next message: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- In reply to: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Next in thread: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Reply: Xenos: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|