Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping

From: Marin David Condic (nobody_at_noplace.com)
Date: 02/17/04

  • Next message: Hugh Lutley: "threads and privacy context pain" 
    Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:23:20 GMT

    Jerry Coffin wrote:
    > In article <402F7EFC.9070304@noplace.com>, nobody@noplace.com says...
    >
    >>Well, from my experience with benchmarking for realtime systems, we
    >>generally drew on sample code that was typical of our control systems.
    >
    >
    > That doesn't sound like anything I'd depend on for a realtime system --
    > to be meaningful in a realtime context, you normally need to look at a
    > worst case, not a typical one.
    >

    "Typical" in the sense that "Typically, we read an A/D converter, apply
    some Y = MX + B code to it, check if for validity, rate and range limit
    it, etc..." I didn't mean "Typical" in the sense of "Usually it goes
    down this path so that's all we need to evaluate..."

    MDC 

    -- 
======================================================================
Marin David Condic
I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm
Send Replies To: m   o   d   c @ a   m   o   g
                    c   n   i       c   .   r
     "Face it ladies, its not the dress that makes you look fat.
     Its the FAT that makes you look fat."
         --  Al Bundy
======================================================================
  • Next message: Hugh Lutley: "threads and privacy context pain"

    Relevant Pages