Re: Pure Aspect-Oriented Program: an example
From: David (dmcreyno_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/20/04
- Previous message: f: "Re: download stock quote from yahoo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:14:07 -0500
I noticed that no one has responded to this posting but what the heck.
Two things:
http://www.springframework.org
and
http://www.research.ibm.com/sop
I haven't looked into aspectJ yet but I did take a look at Cool, Riddle,
and D back in 1998. Back then you could only manage a couple of aspects
like remoteness and synchronization.
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:19:38 -0800, Hung Jung Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking into AOP (Aspect-Oriented Programming) for
> sometime, now. I frankly don't like the syntax of any of the
> approaches I have seen so far. I am kind playing around with some
> ideas, and maybe write up an article later.
>
> AOP is not just buzzword. It's not just callback, it's not just Ruby's
> MixIn, it's not just Python's metaclass, it's not just C++'s template.
> AOP can be implemented/considered as a subset of metaprogramming... an
> important subset that stands on its own. AOP deserves its name,
> because one really can think and program in "aspects" instead of
> "objects". That being said, I have never seen an example of purely
> aspect-based program. So, I thought I'd write up one.
>
> Here it is, and let's get some feedback.
>
> thanks,
>
> Hung Jung
>
- Previous message: f: "Re: download stock quote from yahoo"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|