Re: abstract naming conventions
From: Silvio Bierman (sbierman_at_idfix.nl)
Date: 04/13/04
- Next message: mholme_at_vf.shawcable.net: "My lesbian dildo session pictures 2865"
- Previous message: Shemp: "abstract naming conventions"
- In reply to: Shemp: "abstract naming conventions"
- Next in thread: Yoyoma_2: "Re: abstract naming conventions"
- Reply: Yoyoma_2: "Re: abstract naming conventions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:23:14 +0200
"Shemp" <stoogemaniac@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:btRec.30344$rg5.48802@attbi_s52...
> We are having a debate in our organization about naming conventions for
> abstract classes. The three proposed methods are:
>
> 1) Prefix the class name with abstract. Example: AbstractUser
> 2) Prefix the class name with a: Example aUser
> 3) Don't do anything to the class name.
>
> I would appreciate hearing what everyone else is doing for naming abstract
> classes.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Usually the name of a class would indicate some of it's characteristics. It
being abstract is just one, don't see why that should neccesarily be encoded
in its name. The second option seems in contradiction with the convention
that classnames start with an uppercase letter.
Silvio Bierman
- Next message: mholme_at_vf.shawcable.net: "My lesbian dildo session pictures 2865"
- Previous message: Shemp: "abstract naming conventions"
- In reply to: Shemp: "abstract naming conventions"
- Next in thread: Yoyoma_2: "Re: abstract naming conventions"
- Reply: Yoyoma_2: "Re: abstract naming conventions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|