Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?
From: David Rasmussen (david.rasmussen_at_gmx.net)
Date: 04/27/04
- Next message: NamFu: "Re: endeavors"
- Previous message: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:11:16 +0200
Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
>
> (Since the languages do not have a subset/
> superset relationship, in general compiling a
> C source program with a C++ compiler is not safe.)
>
Nonsense...
> There is more overhead (both space and time)
> even for a C-looking program compiled with C++.
>
More nonsense...
> However, the question was about developing a
> specific application using various PLs. If you
> choose C++, then presumably you will make
> essential use of features specific to that
> language. Objects, for example.
>
And even more.
/David
- Next message: NamFu: "Re: endeavors"
- Previous message: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|