Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: Raymond DeCampo: "Re: Basic Syntax Question - String[].class"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:57:28 +0200
Gregory G Rose wrote:
> In article <c6lv0t$s4a$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
> Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>>What Gwyn meant is, I suppose, that C is not a genuine subset
>>of C++, no more nor less. See the pointer given in Grumble's
>>post.
>
>
> No, he means that C++ is not a genuine superset of
> C. One must get precedence right.
Sorry, what is 'precedence' here? If A is subset of B,
then B is superset of A, and vice versa, isn't it?
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: Raymond DeCampo: "Re: Basic Syntax Question - String[].class"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
