Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?
From: Julie (julie_at_nospam.com)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:05:14 -0700
Dez Akin wrote:
[snip]
> Optimizers are getting smarter though, and I suspect in not too many
> years it will be a waste of time to attempt to out-do the optimizer.
> In a couple of decades at the most I suspect it will be impossible for
> any human to outperform an optimizer. (Massalin's superoptimizer led
> to Denali, which I imagine will lead to more generic optimal code
> approximators)
I don't buy that.
If processing unit architecture stayed the same during that time, then you
would have an argument.
However, each time a processor is revved, new features, behaviors, opcodes,
etc. are added. At that point, the compiler writer must then decide on what
feature to incorporate, if at all, let alone optimizations.
It will always be possible to out-do the optimizer, however the value of such
has been steadily decreasing as processor speeds have increased.
- Next message: Paul Schlyter: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Dez Akin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|